- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 19:06:11 +0900
- To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>,www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
>That being said, I'm not sure what "Tested" and "Testing unnecessary" >are meant for. I'm not the one who added them, but: * If a closed issue doesn't have a "needs test case", is that because we forgot to add one (and there fore should add one now), or because we already have tests, or don't need them? * When updating a CR, all changes need tests. If you have the list of all closed issues that lead to changes in the CR, it is nice to know at a glance whether all the required tests have been written -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On April 25, 2019 6:58:09 PM GMT+09:00, "François REMY" <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: >I personally don't see "testing" work as all that different from "spec >editing" work; they are both part of the same workflow. There is a >natural flow from "Needs feedback" > "Needs edits" > "Needs testcases" >> "Needs test review" which makes it instantly clear where an issue >stands, and I'm not sure what we would gain from having these tags not >sorted right next to each other in the list and all searchable with >only one keyword (when we remove one of these tags, we usually add the >next one in the flow, so it makes sense to keep them tightly grouped) > >That being said, I'm not sure what "Tested" and "Testing unnecessary" >are meant for. Are there many issues tagged with them? If not, should >we drop these two tags? >________________________________ >From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> >Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 9:27 AM >To: www-style list >Subject: labels for testing > >Hi all, > >We now have 4 labels that relate to testing on the issues in >csswg-drafts, but they're not grouped together (where grouping is done >by coloring and alphabetical order): > >As part of the "needs edits", "needs figures", "needs feedback", we >have: >* Needs testcases (WPT) >* Needs review of Test Case(s) > >Separately, we also have: >* Tested >* Testing Unnecessary > >Since the "Needs..." series is mostly about the spec itself, I suggest >renaming the first two labels to group them with the last two: > >"Needs testcases (WPT)" -> "Tests needed" >"Needs review of Test Case(s)" -> "Tests in progress, need work" > >As for the color, do we want all for under a single color, or do we >want to use some color contrast between the two states that indicate >that nothing needs to be done and the two that indicates that something >needs to be done? > >—Florian
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2019 10:06:43 UTC