- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:36:03 +0900
- To: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
- Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
> On Sep 7, 2018, at 13:16, Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org> wrote: > > On 2018-09-06 23:49, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> Hi all, >> PLH and I were talking about obsoleting and superseding stuff, and I >> checked the status on the CSS-WG's Notes. >> https://www.w3.org/TR/?tag=css&status=note >> One that I was surprised to find there is the CSS Profile >> (https://www.w3.org/TR/css-print/). I thought we had retired it, along >> with all other profiles, which are indeed no longer showing in that >> index page. >> I have not yet been able to locate the resolution where we decided to >> do so, but the text in the 2018 CSS Snapshot ED (still pending >> publication, sorry for procrastinating) agrees with my memory: >>> 2.2. CSS Profiles >>> Not all implementations will implement all functionality defined in CSS. >>> In the past, the Working Group published a few Profiles, which were meant to define the minimal subset of CSS that various classes of User Agents were expected to support. >>> This effort has been discontinued, as the Working Group was not finding it effective or useful, and the profiles previously defined are now unmaintained. >> Did we carve out an exception that I'm failing to remember for the >> Print Profile, or did it just slip through the cracks where we retired >> the others? >> Speaking of which, I'll note that other profiles >> (https://www.w3.org/TR/css-mobile/ & https://www.w3.org/TR/css-tv/) >> while correctly missing from the TR index page, do not carry any >> indication inside the document that they are obsolete either. >> Regardless of what happened previous, I think all 3 profiles should be >> fully obsoleted. > > From the minutes[1] I guess it slipped through the cracks. All three specs' ED has obsoletion notes, but css-print's TR version does not have an obsoletion note. > Moreover, in the "current work" page[2], CSS Print Profile is listed as "ComĀpleted" rather than "Abandoned". Seems to me that https://drafts.csswg.org/css-tv/ 's ED is also lacking the obsoletion notice. So we should add it, republish all 3 on TR to get the notice there, mark the Print Profile as Abandonned on the current work page, and exclude it from the TR index page. > > [1] https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-02-08/#e771462 > [2] https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work.en.html >
Received on Friday, 7 September 2018 06:36:30 UTC