- From: Peter Moulder <pjrm@mail.internode.on.net>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:50:40 +1100
- To: Hans Meiser <brille1@hotmail.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:45:44AM +0000, Hans Meiser wrote: > The issue is that documentation like AngularJS, WebPack, NodeJS, NPM, > ASP.NET Core etc. is only fed by HTML/CSS pages. There is no PDF > involved, and printing is done in the web browsers, ad-hoc. No doubt any pdf-based user agent can be used for printing, but if you mean that you want something that works even in web browsers (for which printing is not a priority), then you're somewhat out of luck, as none of the web browsers can print using even "on page 5" or a table of contents according to a quick web search: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30871237/is-css3-function-target-counter-supported-in-the-browsers-like-chrome-ie-etc That's why people do use dedicated tools to print HTML/CSS. So for code documentation (for the general public), the best you can do is either to stick to section numbers, and/or to include CSS for target-counter for the benefit of those who do wish to use the likes of Prince (perhaps via a web service such as DocRaptor): a[href ^= "#"]::after { content: " (on page " target-counter(attr(href), page) ")"; content: " (on " prince-script(...) ")"; /* (i.e. as in previous message) */ } (You shouldn't need @supports here, as CSS rules for error handling and cascading are enough: web browsers should drop both declarations, non-Prince user agents will drop the declaration that mentions prince-script, and the later declarations win in UAs where both are supported. Furthermore, target-counter was around a long time before @supports, so using @supports would even hinder some software.) As an aside, regarding using "above" or "below" when the target is on the same page as the referring text: using DOM alone can break down if either the referring text and/or target text occurs in any kind of float, whose position may differ from the position of its "place-holder" that's most directly visible in the DOM. One might want to use different wording if the target or referring text are in different flows. This is another example of where the complexity of what sort of description one might want argues in favour of a solution that involves script in general. pjrm.
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:51:10 UTC