- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 00:50:35 +0100
- To: public-test-infra <public-test-infra@w3.org>
On 15/09/17 00:46, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: > > > On 14/09/17 19:23, Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: >> The question is where we go from here, and there are three sides to this. >> >> 1. What we do with existing tests: >> >> a. We keep them where they are now. >> >> b. We move all CSS WG spec test suites into css/. >> >> c. We move all CSS WG spec test suites to the top-level. >> >> >> 1. Do we remove the versioning from future CSS WG test suites: >> >> a. Yes. >> >> b. No. >> >> >> 2. Where do new test suites go: >> >> a. At the top level. >> >> b. In css/. >> >> c. Up to the editor of the individual spec. >> >> >> 3. Do we move existing tests to match the above? >> >> a. Yes. >> >> b. No. >> >> >> 4. Where do we run the extra CSS lints: >> >> a. Only in css/. >> >> b. In all directories containing tests for CSS WG specs. >> >> >> As far as I'm aware, the status-quo is 1a, 2a, 3b, 4a. The CSS WG's >> preference is 1b, 2b, 3c, and I assume 4b (given without it the CSS >> WG's tooling is likely to get pretty broken pretty fast). > > Well, I screwed up here. > > The survey meant to end up as: > > 1. Do we put new test suites for CSS WG specs in versioned directories: > > a. Yes > > b. No > > > 2. Where do new test suites for CSS WG specs go: > > a. At the top level > > b. In css/ > > c. Either at the top level or in css/, with no preference between either > except for being consistently in one > > d. Up to the editor of the individual spec as to whether they want to > use the CSS WG tooling > > > 3. Do we move existing tests to match the above: > > a. Yes > > b. No > > > 4. Where do we run the extra CSS-only lints: > > a. Only in css/ > > b. In all directories containing tests for CSS WG specs > > c. Nowhere (and almost certainly break the CSS WG's tooling) > > > And the CSS WG's preference is 1: b, 2: b, 3: a, 4: a/b (they're > identical given previous answers). > > I believe the preference of the WPT admins is 1: b, 2: a, 3: a, 4: c > (this is essentially "remove all special-casing for CSS testsuites"). And given we probably want to garner responses without a million emails: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1KlaK6h0lq4KcoC4_uNMzjXSIqBdmS5lwkbxykNKn9zM/edit (I realise sending an extra email for this is causing an extra million emails, sorry!) /g
Received on Thursday, 14 September 2017 23:51:00 UTC