Re: [csswg] Agenda conf call 13-Sept-2017

Any chance we could bump 7 and 8  to right after item 1? I want to make 
sure one or both doesn't fall over into next week, so that (all being 
well) we can be sure to republish flexbox on Tues 19th.

On 12-Sep-17 19:51, Alan Stearns wrote:
> Time/Phone/WebEx details available to WG Members in w3c-css-wg.
> See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2015AprJun/0206.html
>
> US Toll Number: +1-617-324-0000
>
> For local times, see:
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20170913T16
>
> 0. Extra agenda items and other digressions
>
> 1. Spec Rec Next Steps
>
> 2. [css21][css-inline] Meta bug for line height
>     (please review and add comments to linked issues)
>     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1796#issuecomment-328713658
>
> 3. Test for orthogonal flows in table cells
>     https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/6969#issuecomment-328598209
>
> 4. [css-values] Radians considered useless without π
>     (3 implementers against - close no change?)
>     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/309
>    
> 5. [css-writing-modes][css-values] Font metrics calculation on elements which writing-mode doesn't apply to
>     (accept change to use computed value of writing mode for font-relative units?)
>     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1782#issuecomment-328222293
>    
> 6. [css-grid] Reconsider the meaning of 1fr
>     (change fr based on user feedback?)
>     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1777
>    
> 7. [css-flexbox][css-grid] Intrinsic sizing with ∑flex < 1 is broken
>     (scale [adjust?] flex factors when their sum is too small?)
>     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735
>    
> 8. Republish Flexbox?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Alan
>
>
>
-- 
Chris Lilley
@svgeesus
Technical Director @ W3C
W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media