- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 04:21:21 -0400
- To: Elika Etemad <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Kari Pihkala <kari.pihkala@gmail.com>, W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Le 2017-05-03 01:52, Kari Pihkala a écrit : >> >> If it's typesetting correctly in mixed orientation, but not upright, >> it's a browser bug. >> (I think this is unclear because UTR50 does not provide a data point >> to reference here, >> but the proper behavior can be derived from a combination of UTR50 >> data and the script >> tag.) >> >> ~fantasai Elika, In light of the bug reports filed by Kari, can you have a look at this test then: http://test.csswg.org/suites/css-writing-modes-3_dev/nightly-unstable/html/text-orientation-012.htm which states " This test checks that 'text-orientation: upright' causes characters from horizontal-only scripts and from vertical scripts to be translated upright. " Thanks. Gérard > > Thanks. I filed a bug for Firefox [1] and Chrome [2]. > > I also found a test case for this (Mongolian code points > U+1800–U+18AF), but I don’t understand why it claims it passes for > Blink: > http://test.csswg.org/harness/results/css-writing-modes-3_dev/grouped/text-orientation-script-001b/ > > Chrome doesn’t display Mongolian correctly for text-orientation: > upright. Is the test for something else than testing text-orientation: > upright? I couldn’t find any other test for upright Mongolian. Could > it be added to the tests? > > - Kari > > [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1361631 > [2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=717862
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2017 08:21:55 UTC