- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 23:36:14 +0000
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, Robert Hogan <robhogan@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Can you please have a look at the new text and tell me if that works for you both? I didn't call out an explicit algorithm for now but trying to write one informed how I rewrote some of the paragraphs. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-tables-3/#fragmentation -----Original Message----- From: François REMY Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 1:08 PM To: 'François REMY' <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>; Robert Hogan <robhogan@gmail.com>; www-style list <www-style@w3.org> Subject: RE: [css-tables] Dropping repeated headers/footers when one content row doesn't fit >> I'm reading it to say that as long as repeating the header and footer leaves room for at least part of a tbody row in the fragmentainer then they can both remain. If it doesn't, but dropping the repeated footer allows room for at least part of a tbody row, then drop the repeated footer but keep the repeated header. > > Correct that is what browsers seems to do today. Actually I had a look at our source code, and what Edge and Firefox do is easier than that even, we just repeat the footer/header if they occupy less than 25% of the fragmentainer height. Combined they can therefore never account for more than half of the fragmentainer height, which means that it should be enough to fit a row for sure. I will put that in the spec, that seems reasonable to me.
Received on Friday, 6 January 2017 23:37:00 UTC