W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2017

Re: [css-text-decor]: text-shadow should also apply to replaced content, like semi-transparent images

From: Hans Meiser <brille1@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:53:49 +0000
To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DB5PR08MB03750CFC412619595B16D26EE26E0@DB5PR08MB0375.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Hi,


filter: drop-shadow(); is a good alternative. Thank you for the suggestion!


However, I still cannot get rid of the feeling that the text-shadow property is crippled when it differenciates between text and replaced content. Probably the property name has not been the best choice to take.


Cheers,

Axel


________________________________
From: Anton Nemtsev <anton.nemtsev@vaimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 11:49 AM
To: fantasai
Cc: Axel Dahmen; www-style
Subject: Re: [css-text-decor]: text-shadow should also apply to replaced content, like semi-transparent images

Hi.
Also there are filter: drop-shadow(); which behave in such way.
Is there any reason not to use it?


Anton Nemtsev
Frontend Developer
+38 050 277 38 82
anton.nemtsev@vaimo.com

Vaimo
Zhylianska str. 31
Kiev, Ukraine
+38 044 364 19 66 | www.vaimo.com<http://www.vaimo.com>
Magento eCommerce - Omni-Channel Webshop - Vaimo<http://www.vaimo.com/>
www.vaimo.com
Vaimo, the leading solution partner of Magento, delivers omni-channel responsive eCommerce solutions to merchants around the world. Visit us today to learn more!



We are hiring - Help us grow!
vaimo.com/careers

Follow us:


On 22 December 2016 at 17:19, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 01/28/2015 06:31 PM, Axel Dahmen wrote:
>>
>> Since box-shadow doesn't apply to content but only to boxes, whereas
>> text-shadow applies to the content itself, I suggest to
>> amend the text-shadow property specification to have this property also
>> apply to inline replaced content, e.g.
>> semi-transparent images, like PNG images with transparent areas.
>
>
> While this does seem to make a lot of sense in many cases,
> it's probably too late to make such a change, as 'text-shadow'
> has been in-use with its current semantics for a fairly long
> time now. I'd be afraid that content out there would be
> depending on it not applying.
>
> The other consideration of course is that it is called
> `text-shadow`, and images are not, generally-speaking,
> text. :)
>
> ~fantasai
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 10:54:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:06 UTC