- From: Hans Meiser <brille1@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:53:49 +0000
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DB5PR08MB03750CFC412619595B16D26EE26E0@DB5PR08MB0375.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Hi, filter: drop-shadow(); is a good alternative. Thank you for the suggestion! However, I still cannot get rid of the feeling that the text-shadow property is crippled when it differenciates between text and replaced content. Probably the property name has not been the best choice to take. Cheers, Axel ________________________________ From: Anton Nemtsev <anton.nemtsev@vaimo.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 11:49 AM To: fantasai Cc: Axel Dahmen; www-style Subject: Re: [css-text-decor]: text-shadow should also apply to replaced content, like semi-transparent images Hi. Also there are filter: drop-shadow(); which behave in such way. Is there any reason not to use it? Anton Nemtsev Frontend Developer +38 050 277 38 82 anton.nemtsev@vaimo.com Vaimo Zhylianska str. 31 Kiev, Ukraine +38 044 364 19 66 | www.vaimo.com<http://www.vaimo.com> Magento eCommerce - Omni-Channel Webshop - Vaimo<http://www.vaimo.com/> www.vaimo.com Vaimo, the leading solution partner of Magento, delivers omni-channel responsive eCommerce solutions to merchants around the world. Visit us today to learn more! We are hiring - Help us grow! vaimo.com/careers Follow us: On 22 December 2016 at 17:19, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 01/28/2015 06:31 PM, Axel Dahmen wrote: >> >> Since box-shadow doesn't apply to content but only to boxes, whereas >> text-shadow applies to the content itself, I suggest to >> amend the text-shadow property specification to have this property also >> apply to inline replaced content, e.g. >> semi-transparent images, like PNG images with transparent areas. > > > While this does seem to make a lot of sense in many cases, > it's probably too late to make such a change, as 'text-shadow' > has been in-use with its current semantics for a fairly long > time now. I'd be afraid that content out there would be > depending on it not applying. > > The other consideration of course is that it is called > `text-shadow`, and images are not, generally-speaking, > text. :) > > ~fantasai >
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 10:54:25 UTC