- From: Anton Nemtsev <anton.nemtsev@vaimo.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:49:53 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com>, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Hi. Also there are filter: drop-shadow(); which behave in such way. Is there any reason not to use it? Anton Nemtsev Frontend Developer +38 050 277 38 82 anton.nemtsev@vaimo.com Vaimo Zhylianska str. 31 Kiev, Ukraine +38 044 364 19 66 | www.vaimo.com We are hiring - Help us grow! vaimo.com/careers Follow us: On 22 December 2016 at 17:19, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 01/28/2015 06:31 PM, Axel Dahmen wrote: >> >> Since box-shadow doesn't apply to content but only to boxes, whereas >> text-shadow applies to the content itself, I suggest to >> amend the text-shadow property specification to have this property also >> apply to inline replaced content, e.g. >> semi-transparent images, like PNG images with transparent areas. > > > While this does seem to make a lot of sense in many cases, > it's probably too late to make such a change, as 'text-shadow' > has been in-use with its current semantics for a fairly long > time now. I'd be afraid that content out there would be > depending on it not applying. > > The other consideration of course is that it is called > `text-shadow`, and images are not, generally-speaking, > text. :) > > ~fantasai >
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 10:51:10 UTC