- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:59:34 -0800
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: > On 2017-02-17 18:18, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>> The only testable thing about serialization in css-variables is >>> >>> Custom property names must be serialized with the casing as provided by >>> the >>> author. >>> >>> >>> and then goes on to kind of contradict itself by saying that >>> implementations >>> typically don't do that. >>> >>> Ordinarily, property names are restricted to the ASCII range and are >>> ASCII >>> case-insensitive, so implementations typically serialize the name >>> lowercased. >> >> This isn't contradicting itself, it's referring to the "ordinary" >> behavior for non-custom properties. > > Ah, okay. In that case the spec text could be clarified. Perhaps > s/Ordinarily, property names/Ordinarily, non-custom property names/ Sounds fine to me. Done. (In both places where I use this construction. ^_^) ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2017 18:00:31 UTC