W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2017

Re: [css-text-decor] Proposal for the 'text-emphasis-position' property syntax values

From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 16:13:49 -0500
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <32e6f2194b7f2d040213ebd31977a349@gtalbot.org>
Le 2017-02-07 14:51, fantasai a écrit :
> On 02/03/2017 07:10 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote:
>> Hi fantasai,
>>> The key thing to realize is that the "before" side and the "over" 
>>> side do not
>>> coincide in Mongolian writing. See 
>>> https://www.w3.org/TR/css-writing-modes-3/#text-flow
>> I have filed https://github.com/w3c/ttml2/issues/240
>>> Haven't gotten any use-case-backed requests yet, though.
>> Can you provide (privately if you prefer) what the WG considers a
>> "use-case-backed request"?
> Someone being like, "I want to make a page that looks like X and
> it's not possible with CSS today", where X is a realistic thing
> someone would want to do rather than a mere thought experiment.


Maybe this reply is not perfectly on topic... but anyways...

While developing a test [1] on text-shadow, I stumbled on the difficulty 
of figuring out where the emphasis marks for 'text-emphasis-position' 
should be respectively for glyphs with 'text-orientation: upgright' and 
'text-orientation: sideways'.

The spec on text-emphasis-position [2] states

     Draw marks over the text in horizontal writing mode.

     Draw marks to the right of the text in vertical writing mode.

but what if I use 'text-orientation: upright' on a run of text? Then 

In this test


the middle stripe has 'text-orientation: upright' .


3.4. Emphasis Mark Position: the 'text-emphasis-position' property

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 21:14:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:15:02 UTC