W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2017

Re: Shorthands resetting properties they cannot set

From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:53:50 -0500
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <eb892895e6ee3b296bdf845c7733225e@gtalbot.org>
Le 2017-12-15 04:22, Florian Rivoal a écrit :

> So, for me, it seems there's 3 parts of to this argument:
> 1) Should shorthands reset related longhands if even if they cannot set 
> them?
> I say yes in the cases where not resetting the longhands would mean
> the shorthand wouldn't do the expected job.

So you should be for "border: thin solid red" resetting a 
"border-radius: 50%" then.
And you should be for "font: 20px Times New Roman" resetting 
"font-size-adjust: 0.545" then.

> If i say "border: thin solid red" or "background: url("foo.jpg")" I
> want a solid thin red border or a foo.jpg background. I want that to
> remain true when more properties are added to CSS, otherwise
> maintenance becomes harder.
> 2) Should the above behavior be true for some property and not others?
> That looks messy and hard to learn.
> 3) Should border-image exist?

I think it should be renamed, it should use an identifier better 
describing what it does and what it can do. How about "border-box-layer" 
or "image-box-layer"?

Received on Friday, 15 December 2017 15:54:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:09 UTC