- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:50:02 +0900
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 19/04/17 15:38, Lea Verou wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As written in the current ED, the default sizing algorithm (§5.3.1) >> contains: >> >> > If the specified size has no constraints: >> > 1. If the object has an intrinsic height or width, its size is >> > resolved as if its intrinsic size were given as the specified size. >> > 2. Otherwise, its size is resolved as a contain constraint against >> > the default object size. >> >> 1 and 2 both invoke sub-algorithms, but fall into specific cases of >> these algorithms. I think the quoted text would be more clearly >> written as: >> >> > If the specified size has no constraints, each dimension of the >> > concrete object size is taken from the intrinsic dimensions if that >> > intrinsic dimension is given, from the default object size >> > otherwise. >> >> -- >> Simon Sapin > > This is not equivalent: Your wording is not equivalent to the original, > since it resolves dimensions separately, ignoring any intrinsic aspect > ratio. You’re right. I don’t remember the details, but it looks like when I wrote that email I misunderstood the bit of spec that I proposed modifying. It also looks like I intended this to be an editorial-only change, so no change is fine. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 19 April 2017 06:50:41 UTC