W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2016

RE: [css-tables-3] Overconstrained fixed table layout: tests and questions

From: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:40:47 +0000
To: Chris Rebert <csswg@chrisrebert.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
CC: Francois Remy <frremy@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <SN2PR03MB2158EB12ABB4DEBF16BAB2DAA4F10@SN2PR03MB2158.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016, at 07:19 PM, GĂ©rard Talbot wrote:
><snip>
> - - - - - -
>
> http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/border-spacing-percentage-cell-001.html

> How wide should be the navy rectangle: 200px or 400px?
>
> IE11: 200px
> Firefox 48: 400px
> Chrome 53: 200px
> Edge: 200px
> Opera 12.16: 200px
> Safari 9.1.2: 200px
> Regards,
> Chris

+Francois so he sees this (we're checking www-style less and less lately)

Thanks Gerard and Chris,

Yes sizing of a fixed layout does fit in charter of the current spec, and ideally we would define for the interop, thus Firefox being the outlier. That said, we'll need to dig into the testcase and all of its additional implications of course.

I have opened a Github issue for this so I don't loose track of it: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/485


We'll keep you posted,
Greg
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2016 17:41:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:04 UTC