- From: Oriol _ <oriol-bugzilla@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:42:23 +0000
- To: Alexander Shpack <shadowkin@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:43:00 UTC
I think this could produce infinite loops:
```css
:in-view(all) {
display: none;
}
```
- Oriol
________________________________
Hi folks!
It would be perfect if we get the next pseudo class: :in-view() with a different parameters
:in-view(all) - selected node is 100% visible in viewport
:in-view(partial) - selected node is partially visible in viewport
:in-view(none) - selected node is outside of viewport
And inverted logic using :not()
:not(:in-view(all)) - synonym of :in-view(none)
:not(:in-view(partial)) - selected node is partially INvisible in viewport
:not(:in-view(none)) - synonym of :in-view(all)
Real cases are the next.
If I have some absolutely positioned popup blocks inside of relative positioned ones, sometimes it fall out from viewport due relative block position I would like to return that block into a viewport again. Now I have to use JS.
Other one is sticky behavior. I can hide something or change the position just using :in-view(partial) selector. I don't need position: sticky anymore :)
So, what do you think about it?
--
s0rr0w
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 19:43:00 UTC