- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 05:33:02 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 11/24/2016 05:14 AM, fantasai wrote: > On 11/24/2016 04:19 AM, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 23/11/16 21:19, Mats Palmgren wrote: >>> On 11/21/2016 05:41 PM, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: >>>> 1) Alignment and shipment >>>> So it seems their current plan is to ship the whole thing. >>> >>> We shared our plans and reasoning about that, on this list, long >>> before our intent-to-ship: >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Oct/0011.html >>> >>> IIUC, you're now implementing baseline alignment in Chrome too >>> so I don't understand what the fuss is about here... >> >> The question is what we both should ship or not. fantasai's reply to >> that thread was: >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0014.html > > Yeah, I meant to say, everything that's in Flexbox, plus anything > that is trivially analogous. Those things should be stable, because > we have to maintain compatibility with Flexbox. I'm less sure of > the rest of the spec... which isn't to say it necessarily has problems, > but since it's not effectively ported from Flexbox, I'm less sure. s/effectively/essentially/ :) ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2016 10:33:38 UTC