Re: [css-fonts] Specifying changes to parameters for fallback fonts

Le 2016-05-25 11:58, ishida@w3.org a écrit :


> == [css-fonts] Specifying changes to parameters for fallback fonts ==
> After another session of fruitless wrestling with fonts, i thought i
> should make sure (a) i'm not missing something obvious, and (b) if
> not, ask whether we can improve CSS.
> 
> This time i was trying to get a particular look across Mac- and
> Windows-based browsers. On the Mac i like the look of Helvetica Neue
> with font-weight set to 300 at a font size of 16px.  But i can't find
> anything to match that in Windows standard fonts – well, i could get
> reasonably close, but i'd need to be able to change the font weight
> and the font size for a font-family name specified as a fallback.
> 
> I've never understood why, in CSS, i can't say something like
> 
> p { font: 'macfont' 300 16px, 'windowsfont' 500 18px, sans-serif  }
> 
> This is a much bigger problem in non-Latin scripts, where glyph
> dimensions can vary widely from font to font at the same font-size.
> For example, compare the same glyphs set to the exact same font-size
> in Mongolian Baiti and Noto Sans Mongolian:
> 

Richard,

I am not an expert in Mongolian language, alphabet and Mongolian writing 
systems... but it is my understanding that there are several writing 
systems (Traditional Mongolian, Cyrillic Mongolian and other writing 
systems): several pages at wikipedia are overwhelmingly convincing on 
this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_writing_systems

therefore I would assume that some fonts (N) are better for some script 
(1).

I know there are cursive fonts in Mongolian too.

Gérard

> ![screen shot 2016-05-18 at 16 45
> 32](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/4839211/15365391/03a38354-1d18-11e6-82cf-0db2412a3bb0.png)
> 
> It's not just mongolian, this is a constant problem in arabic, and
> many other scripts.
> 
> And by the way, i thought about web fonts, but i can't help thinking
> that you should be able to just use standard platform fonts if you
> want to.  Note that that tweaking the size/weight of such fonts would
> be easier than finding fonts that look good and can be used for free
> to cover the up to 15 languages we have on the i18n site, but also
> we're often dealing with multiple languages on a given page for
> examples etc, which also ramps up the bandwidth when using webfonts.
> 
> What am i missing?
> 
> See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/126

Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 19:33:29 UTC