- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 14:51:52 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>, Jen Simmons <jen@jensimmons.com>, Rachel Andrew <rachelandrewuk@gmail.com>
On 04/14/2016 03:35 PM, fantasai wrote:
> This is in reference to the following issues:
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-1/issues-wd-20150917#issue-25
> Subgrids considered essential
> Eric Meyer, Rachel Andrews, Jen Simmons, et al.
>
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-1/issues-wd-20150917#issue-28
> Concerns with subgrid
> Igalia
>
> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-1/issues-wd-20150917#issue-31
> Simplifying subgrids
> François Remy
>
> [... proposal ...]
To close on this, the CSSWG resolved to accept the reduced subgrid
proposal outlined here. Related notes are
* We dropped named lines for subgrids entirely; this may be added
in a future level.
* We expanded grid-auto-rows/columns and the repeat() syntax to
accept multiple track listings in order to accommodate subgrids
that have been auto-placed (as in fremy's example).
* We are making subgrid behavior contingent on there not being
any grid-template-* declarations, rather than merely ignoring
them, with the hope that authors will not leave any such
declarations lying around. Our goal is to allow for more
sophisticated interleaving of subgrid and parent grid lines
(e.g. 1-axis subgrids) using these properties. This may or may
not work out as planned. :)
The spec will be fully updated shortly.
~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 21:52:21 UTC