- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 17:48:15 -0700
- To: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>, www-style@w3.org
On 05/06/2016 03:55 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote: > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#pagination > "The same rules apply to any other fragmenters. (Substitute “page” > with the appropriate fragmenter type as needed.)" > > These sentences could be clearer by using terms defined in css-break. > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-break/#fragmentation-model > > I think what you mean is: > "The same rules apply to any other fragmentation context. > (Substitute “page” with the appropriate fragmentainer as needed.)" > > Would be good to linkify the first use of each term as well: > "fragmentation context" > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-break/#fragmentation-context > "fragmentainer" > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-break/#fragmentainer On 05/06/2016 04:09 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote: > ... and css-grid have similar text that should be updated to > read the same as css-flexbox: > > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#pagination > "The following breaking rules refer to the fragmentation container as the > “page”. The same rules apply to any other fragmentation containers. > (Substitute “page” with the appropriate fragmentation container type as > needed.)" Fixed. Thanks! ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 7 May 2016 00:51:02 UTC