- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 14:30:04 +0900
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Myles C. Maxfield" <mmaxfield@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 6 May 2016 05:30:51 UTC
2016-05-06 13:29 GMT+09:00 Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>: > [please don't top-post https://wiki.csswg.org/tools/www-style] > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Myles C. Maxfield <mmaxfield@apple.com> > wrote: > > The spec has rather peculiar wording around this, as if it is making > special > > affordances to make sure the first rectangle is always in the return > value. > > > > Do we know why the current version is written this way? > > It's probably an attempt to be clever/compact and ensure that you > don't hit a degenerate case (no rectangles left). > > ~TJ > It looks like this was done for the feedback from roc[1], so that it returns a meaningful value for a collapsed range. But when Blink fixed this[2], authors complained to us that the algorithm is not reasonable when rects[0] is empty and rect[1] is not. I then talked to roc to confirm that Gecko does what proposed here rather than what's currently spec'ed. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jul/0149.html [2] http://crbug.com/574363 /koji
Received on Friday, 6 May 2016 05:30:51 UTC