Re: [css-pseudo] Need a way to styling the disclosure triangle of the <details> (or <summary>) element

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Daniel Glazman
<> wrote:
> On 08/03/2016 17:20, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> There hasn't been a lot of call for "a block with a marker" yet, so I
>> wouldn't be surprised if most people haven't built up a functional
>> understanding of what display:list-item does; it's pretty reasonable
>> for them currently to think of it as "the thing that goes on <li>".
>> But there's no reason to presume that it will stay this way, and
>> people will have trouble adapting their functional understanding of
>> the value.
> What *is* (I can bolden things too) reasonable is to always do what
> we have to do the best possible way because when we don't, we OFTEN
> IF NOT ALWAYS end up years later with a MUCH larger problem. I am
> reacting here because I have more than the gut feeling we're reusing
> something in a suboptimal manner. Patrick expressed it better than I
> could do.
>> (All this presumes that people *will care in the slightest*, which I
>> doubt for the most part.  We're adjusting the UA stylesheet for a
>> rarely-used element, not authoring a new tutorial guide.)
> In short, "people don't care, this is minor, our hack is enough".
> This is not really how I see standards' production, and this is not
> how I care about our users, web authors.
> Reality is that we should alias the 'list-item' value to 'marked',
> have "marker-*" property aliases for 'list-*' properties, and move to
> those new values to do things the clean way. We made a bit of a MISTAKE
> when we designed the older names, sticking to lists instead of going to
> the essential (markers) so it could be reused in the future without
> confusion.

Please explain how your reasoning does not require us to add aliases
for the table-* display values as well.


Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:52:47 UTC