Two people read the text differently, so the clarification appreciated. Both word-wrap/overflow-wrap: break-word[1] and word-break: break-all[2] say: > Shaping characters are still shaped as if the word were not broken. and > When shaping scripts such as Arabic are allowed to break within words due to break-all, the characters must still be shaped as if the word were not broken. One read these text as after a word was broken, each broken part is reshaped as if it is a word. The other read as after a word was broken, the reshape must not occur. Which is correct? [1] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/#valdef-overflow-wrap-break-word [2] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/#valdef-word-break-break-all /kojiReceived on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 02:19:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:01 UTC