On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com> wrote: > Regarding my second point about extending <image> to accept <color> > values, I saw that you had the same idea some years ago.[1] > It looks like fantasai was reluctant to this idea but the thread > didn't come to a conclusion and as far as I can see this is also not > mentioned in any WG minutes. So, maybe this topic should be revived? Nah, it would cause enough grammatical ambiguity that I'm fine with not doing it, and just letting image(<color>) fill that void. ~TJReceived on Thursday, 3 March 2016 23:36:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:01 UTC