On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > In a recent email, Tab mentioned that calc() should be nestable, and > should just be identical to parentheses. > > I'd like to propose that, when serializing nested calc(), flattening > it to parentheses as well, instead of keeping the original redundant > function name. > > It seems in both the spec and the impls, we already have some kind of > simplifying process, thus I think flattening nested calc() to > parentheses seems reasonable. It would likely also make implementation > simpler. I agree with this. ~TJReceived on Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:04:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:01 UTC