- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:04:05 -0800
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > In a recent email, Tab mentioned that calc() should be nestable, and > should just be identical to parentheses. > > I'd like to propose that, when serializing nested calc(), flattening > it to parentheses as well, instead of keeping the original redundant > function name. > > It seems in both the spec and the impls, we already have some kind of > simplifying process, thus I think flattening nested calc() to > parentheses seems reasonable. It would likely also make implementation > simpler. I agree with this. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 20:04:54 UTC