On 21/06/2016 12:48, Simon Pieters wrote: ntainment makes sense in the OM but not in the syntax. Can't we > have it both ways? > > Given this stylesheet: > > @media (...) { ... } > @else { ... } > > ...the OM contains only one CSSMediaRule, no sibling. Instead that rule > has a property .else that points to the CSSElseRule (which can itself > have further .else, and also a property to point to its owner). So if > you remove the @media rule in the OM, the @else rule is removed with it. > > I suppose it is a bit confusing to have the syntax and OM have different > structure, but I thought I'd bring it up as a possible way forward. That could be a workable compromise for one part of my concerns, yes. Thanks, Simon. I'm still not convinced at all the complexification of MQs created by @else is needed. </Daniel>Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 11:50:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:03 UTC