- From: Garrett Smith <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:26:54 -0700
- To: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2016 00:27:24 UTC
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote: > I think both <img src="cutekittens.mp4"> and > url(cutekittens-v-bulldozer.mp4) should be supported. We've done some > internal prototypes and it's very nice. > > I'm not sure about media controls on the <img> case. I think we should > start with something that is the same behaviour as a GIF is today. > > If it's possible to harness such powerful control over the browser, people will do it in the worst way possible. They might even use JS libraries and then call it a best practice for ads, etc that the user can't see and cannot stop. The `content` property doesn't seem like a good place to declare media for CSS. Thinking if you want :active to trigger audio, etc and have that be presentation-only. -- Garrett Guitar Videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY_uK9hur86KEuiG8s7yvWw @xkit
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2016 00:27:24 UTC