- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:26:51 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Forward of the last time we chatted about Scoped Style, per request from Tab on today's telcon. -t ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:56 PM Subject: Re: [blink][edge][webkit] steps toward <style scoped> : first do no harm To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > I recently found a nice use-case for <style scoped> : per post custom > styling, that would work not only on a post's permalink page, but also > on a post when display in a stream, like on a home page. > > I had just created a bit of CSS for the recent "pride weekend" in San Francisco: > > http://tantek.com/2015/178/t1/lovewins-css3-pride-rainbow-background > > And decided I wanted to keep that custom rainbow bg styling on that > post, while reverting other posts to their "normal" styling. > > I implemented this using <style scoped> and it worked exactly as expected: > > http://tantek.com/2015/185/t1/coded-per-post-styling-style-scoped > > On both the post by itself and when it was present in a list of posts > like on my homepage. > > At least in Gecko. > > When I tried it other browsers, the rules from the <style scoped> leak > out to the rest of the document, affecting all posts. > > E.g. this is a relatively recent Edge screenshot (via a friend) > > http://i.imgur.com/CUXPIJk.png > > > Thus this is a request - short of fully implementing <style scoped>: > > > ** Could Blink, Edge, and Webkit at least *not* apply <style scoped>? ** > > > I looked for such "first do no harm" bugs for each and couldn't find > any, so I'm sending this message here to broaden awareness and > hopefully get someone from each engine to file a bug and report back a > publicly viewable URL for it so we can track it. This would, in fact, do harm today. If you'd proposed it years ago when <style scoped> was first introduced, maybe, but now, there's usage in the wild that puts an id on the scoping element and uses that in the selectors inside of <style scoped>, so that it works in all browsers (but hopefully gets performance benefits in those that actually implement scoped=''). For example, several examples in the Flexbox spec do this. > That being said, if any other engine can share an intent to actually > get <style scoped> working in some reasonable timeframe, that would be > appreciated as well! Chrome still doesn't have any current plans to implement this. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2016 16:27:56 UTC