W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [css-sizing] min-content for replaced elements with an aspect ratio

From: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:10:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPTJ0XGCPDOx3AVE0Y5my2dJgJOR8WcEVs+Rwr0NM_BybV_12w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
OK, thanks. I'll fix Blink to consistently use 60px here.

-Christian

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 12:07 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
>> On 01/27/2016 11:51 AM, Christian Biesinger wrote:
>>> Oh. I hadn't actually tested it, this was based on an email
>>> conversation I had with Rego... I assume Gecko would also resolve it
>>> to 60px for a flexbox min-width: auto?
>>
>> We should, but we don't right now (we resolve it to 100px).
>>
>> Testcase for that:
>>  https://jsfiddle.net/t9Laskra/1/
>>
>> I believe that's because the min-width:auto spec text about "transferred
>> size" has changed during the time since I resurrected Firefox's
>> 'min-width:auto' implementation.  IIRC, it used to require that the
>> transferred size would trump the min-content size (and make the image
>> wider than its intrinsic size) -- but it no longer does.
>
> This is filed as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1136312
> btw.  I should get to fixing that.
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 20:11:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:00 UTC