- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:26:54 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>, Rachel Andrew <rachelandrewuk@gmail.com>
On 01/19/2016 01:05 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 10/02/2015 04:50 PM, Javier Fernandez wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10/03/2015 12:19 AM, fantasai wrote:> >>> The CSS Alignment spec says that for 'align-content' >>> * for flex lines, the initial behavior is stretch >>> * for grid tracks, the initial behavior is start >>> [...] > The WG resolved on this, yay. ^_^ > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0031.html > The Alignment ED has been updated. Hope to publish a new WD shortly, too. Are you sure the alignment ED has been updated to make align-content default to 'stretch'? (maybe you've updated it locally, but need to push to the repo?) The only recent change I see to css-align "align-content" in the hg.csswg.org repo is just changing the default "align-content" value to "normal": https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/07f5089d0ee9/css-align/Overview.bs (This happened before that CSSWG resolution, too.) And "normal" is still specced as resolving to "start" (not "stretch") for grid containers: # Grid Containers: # [...] # 'normal' behaves as 'start'. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align-3/#propdef-align-content So I think the spec still needs a change to match this CSSWG resolution, at this point. ~Daniel
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 21:27:27 UTC