- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 13:05:14 -0800
- To: Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>, Rachel Andrew <rachelandrewuk@gmail.com>
On 10/02/2015 04:50 PM, Javier Fernandez wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/03/2015 12:19 AM, fantasai wrote:> >> The CSS Alignment spec says that for 'align-content' >> * for flex lines, the initial behavior is stretch >> * for grid tracks, the initial behavior is start >> >> This is somewhat inconsistent, and I was wondering if we >> should change the initial value for grid tracks to match >> flexbox, i.e. be 'stretch' as well. Note this would only >> affect 'auto'-sized grid tracks. > > Well, I also found that inconsistency kind of weird, which led to a more > complicated implementation indeed, although nothing impossible to do, > though. If there is no special reason to keep this different behavior, > I'd rather simplifying it using 'stretch' for both. The WG resolved on this, yay. ^_^ https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0031.html The Alignment ED has been updated. Hope to publish a new WD shortly, too. ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 21:05:49 UTC