- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:20:05 -0800
- To: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > Context: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1236386 > https://bug1236386.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=8703469 > > This issue's probably already been discussed but I don't know where. The > question is: how does a transformed element contribute to the scrollable > area of an "overflow:auto/scroll" ancestor? For example, does its border-box > before transformation contribute to the scrollable area? > > In the referenced testcase Chrome seems to say "no" if the transformed > element is a direct child of the box, "yes" otherwise. Firefox says "yes, > but only in the vertical direction". Edge says "yes". More testing would > probably be worthwhile. I think the answer needs to be "yes". We've slid into treating transforms as a kind of positioning scheme, and it seems obviously correct that snap points should respond to transforms, so scrolling in general should as well. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 19:20:53 UTC