- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:43:12 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/09/2016 11:13 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: >> >> Right. I don't think we should pin down exactly how long the scripts run, >> since there are too many possible variants. But maybe we can set a minimum >> threshold, so that authors have something to depend on. Can they depend >> on the onload even firing if @scripting: initial-only is true, or is there >> a risk that a UA which runs synchronous scripts as they get parsed but >> never fires any event would still match? > > I don't think we should determine any of this. We don't care. Our MQ > is so that authors can safely guard styles that will be used on an > "active scripting" page and not pollute the printed/etc page. I agree with Florian that we should set a minimum requirement. > Precisely when that happens doesn't really matter for our purposes, > and the choice of exactly how much script gets run in an > "initial-only" UA is a quality-of-implementation decision. If they > cut it off too early they'll break pages *regardless* of this MQ. Breaking pages on the Web is not a concern of certain implementations that would be needing the 'initial-only' value. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2016 04:43:41 UTC