- From: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:30:02 +0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ting-Yu Lin <tlin@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Ting-Yu Lin <tlin@mozilla.com> wrote: >>>> This question was raised in bug 1221416 when implementing <details> and >>>> <summary> elements in Firefox. >>>> >>>> We might need a way to support styling for the disclosure triangle of the >>>> <details> (or <summary>) element. Currently, webkit supports a non-standard >>>> pseudo-class summary::-webkit-details-marker as this article said. >>>> >>>> Xidorn proposed here that we could add ::marker support for <summary> >>>> element in pseudo-element spec. >>>> >>>> Any ideas? >>> >>> I'm happy with Xidorn's idea, and it's already supported by the >>> Counter Styles spec, which has list-style values specifically defined >>> for this. >> >> Yes, but the question is, do we want to make <summary> a list-item? I >> don't think it makes sense. Using list-style on <summary> looks weird >> to me. In the current spec, ::marker is only generated for list-item >> (and inline-list-item). If we want to extend the range ::marker is >> applied to, we would probably need a new concept for it? > > The concept is "list-item". It's an unfortunate legacy name, but that > happens sometimes. So you are suggesting we make <summary> (or <details>?) to have "display: list-item" by default, and applies list-style and ::marker on it, right? I'm fine with this, though it looks a bit weird, but acceptable and seems to be practical for implementing. - Xidorn
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2016 01:31:11 UTC