W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [css-images][svg2] gradient rendering and the image-rendering property

From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:41:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFDDJ7zamVgM=khzp5e1Kq=pq1FwmQkpzbjKF47AfNFM0J6Uog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
> Given that Rick has said that this is a Chrome bug that has been fixed, do
> you still think this new property is required?
I'm ambivalent. If implementers want to focus on improving gradient
rendering everywhere instead of adding multiple rendering options, and
believe that it can be done without performance trade-offs, that sounds
good to me.  Particular rendering options like dithering could be left up
to the implementation, with graphics software for print being more likely
to benefit from them.

Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2016 20:42:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:57 UTC