- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:39:35 +0100
- To: "Karl Dubost" <kdubost@mozilla.com>, "Florian Rivoal" <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, "Simon Fraser" <smfr@me.com>, "Ian Kilpatrick" <ikilpatrick@chromium.org>
On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 09:55:27 +0100, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > Last we spoke about this in New York, Microsoft wanted to either kill > the zoom property (i.e. actually remove it from the implementations that > support it), or to spec it and have it interoperably implemented across > the board. The general preference was in favor of killing it, but Apple > had some reservations and wanted to check more data before committing to > killing it. > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0282.html > > I may have missed something, but I believe we did not revisit the topic > later on, so we are still there: There's a general preference for > getting rid of it, but no commitment, and we have a proposed spec that > we could adopt if we decide to keep it after all. > > I believe the ball is in Apple's court. I see there's a use counter for 'zoom' (with a value other than 1) for Chrome: https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/691 ~0.9% is pretty high... Usage of 'zoom' (any value): https://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/css/timeline/popularity/19 ~42%, crazy high. It's not clear to me if zoom:1 is a no-op or if it does something. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 14:40:09 UTC