- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 14:39:22 -0800
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
On 01/27/2016 12:07 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > On 01/27/2016 11:51 AM, Christian Biesinger wrote: >> Oh. I hadn't actually tested it, this was based on an email >> conversation I had with Rego... I assume Gecko would also resolve it >> to 60px for a flexbox min-width: auto? > > We should, but we don't right now (we resolve it to 100px). > > Testcase for that: > https://jsfiddle.net/t9Laskra/1/ > > I believe that's because the min-width:auto spec text about "transferred > size" has changed during the time since I resurrected Firefox's > 'min-width:auto' implementation. IIRC, it used to require that the > transferred size would trump the min-content size (and make the image > wider than its intrinsic size) -- but it no longer does. Eh? Was that an intentional change to the spec? o_O *really needs to rewrite this section, it's nearly incomprehensible* ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 1 February 2016 02:49:31 UTC