- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:13:14 +0330
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
I've drafted up a Disposition of Comments for the 2013 CSS Text Decoration CR: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013 There's a bunch of issues which have proposed edits that need review, a few that are still open for discussion with no concrete proposal, and some that are looking for i18n input. Those open for the CSSWG's action are marked with =WG=, and those looking for i18n input are marked =i18n= in the issues list. A summary follows. Please review the list, and if you have input, send it to us for consideration. :) Issues that need further discussion: Issue 1: Allow UA to skip ink by default https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-1 Proposed to handle this via UA stylesheet rather than initial value. Issue 25: New keyword to represent complex initial value of text-decoration-skip https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-1 Proposed to accept, meaning might depend on #1. Issue 9: Clarify position of emphasis marks over auto-hidden ruby https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-9 Needs further input from CJK community and implementers. Issue 10: Are there emphasis mark position preferences for Korean? https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-12 https://github.com/w3c/klreq/issues/19 Needs info from Korean community. Issue 11: Emphasis marks shouldn't apply to punctuation https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-16 Needs further input from CJK community if changes are desired. See also https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-4/#text-emphasis-skip and view-source:https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-4/Overview.bs (which contains some comments). Follow-up to https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/839 Issue 21: Interaction of text decoration, emphasis dots, & ruby https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-21 Currently under discussion. Issue 22: CJK doesn't like skipping ink, shouldn't by default https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-22 Currently under discussion, possibly a quality-of-implementation issue. Issue 25: Position of underline should depend on skipped things https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-25 Needs CSSWG discussion. Edits proposed (or issue rejected), need WG approval: Issue 10: Clarify whether emphasis marks are upright or sideways for sideways-rl/lr https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-10 Proposed edits make them sideways, since these writing modes are intended to be effectively rotated horizontal text. Issue 13: Should emphasis marks use 'font-variant: ruby'? https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-13 Proposed edits apply 'ruby' per Ken Lunde's recommendation. Issues 11, 18, 19: Improvements to default UA stylesheet suggestions https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-11 https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-18 https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-19 Proposed edits to better handle nesting of languages and to avoid altering existing horizontal content. Issue 18: 'text-emphasis-position' requires too many arguments https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-17 Proposed to make vertical-mode argument optional. Needs CSSWG approval and i18n to check assumptions. :) Issue 20: Update spec to handle sideways-lr/sideways-rl https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-20 Proposed to make these behave exactly as rotated horizontal text, see https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0119.html Issues rejected, need WG approval: Issue 5: text-shadow should apply to inline images https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-5 Proposed to reject due to compat considerations Issue 14: 'text-emphasis' shorthand should not allow only <color> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-14 Rejected based on existing CSS syntactic patterns like 'border'. Issues that were deferred: Issue 2: text-decoration-color vs SVG fills https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-2 Deferred to FXTF Paint spec Issue 3: Allow specifying position and thickness of underlines https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-3 Deferred to L4 Issue 4: Allow arbitrary decorations https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/issues-cr-2013#issue-4 Deferred to as-yet-unknown spec and/or never? ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2016 15:44:10 UTC