Re: [css3-selectors]: Proposal: :in-view() selector for better visibility control

> Well. Again, this is what :not() is for. Your :in-view(partial) is
> exactly :not(:in-view(all)):not(:in-view(none)).
>
>
It's not a problem. I fully agree with it.


>
> Anyway, I don't think your proposal is doable because of infinite loops.
>
> </Daniel>
>

Flexboxes also can lead to infinite loops, but we are seeing it in
specification. :)

-- 
s0rr0w