Re: [css3-selectors]: Proposal: :in-view() selector for better visibility control from Daniel Glazman on 2016-12-01 (www-style@w3.org from December 2016)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:50:16 +0100
To: Alexander Shpack <shadowkin@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <98cc984a-f265-9c10-eeb5-4e4afa0af583@disruptive-innovations.com>

On 01/12/2016 09:07, Alexander Shpack wrote:

> I thought about it one more time... No, we can't remove "partial"
> parameter. We have 3 states and :not(:in-view(all)) don't cover partial
> statement, because it includes both statements: partial and none.

Well. Again, this is what :not() is for. Your :in-view(partial) is
exactly :not(:in-view(all)):not(:in-view(none)).

Anyway, I don't think your proposal is doable because of infinite loops.

</Daniel>

Received on Thursday, 1 December 2016 08:50:53 UTC