W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2016

Re: [css-selectors] :focus and :checked

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 10:01:19 -0700
Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EFD6525C-50E8-4A5B-9A2C-43B22610BF98@gmail.com>
To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>

> On Aug 5, 2016, at 2:15 AM, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net> wrote:
> 
> But the definition of this is in HTML, not CSS, and IIRC I failed to convince the whatwg.

Why can't we just create our own independent definition in CSS for the :checked behavior, and then let WHAT change their definition to match the new reality once browsers implement it our way?

Received on Saturday, 6 August 2016 17:09:58 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amelia Bellamy-Royds: "Re: [css-selectors] :focus and :checked"
Previous message: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [css-logical-props] CSS Logical Properties missing from CSS status page"
In reply to: Florian Rivoal: "Re: [css-selectors] :focus and :checked"
Next in thread: Amelia Bellamy-Royds: "Re: [css-selectors] :focus and :checked"
Reply: Amelia Bellamy-Royds: "Re: [css-selectors] :focus and :checked"
Reply: Tab Atkins Jr.: "Re: [css-selectors] :focus and :checked"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:04 UTC