- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:59:53 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 02/08/2016 10:11, Xidorn Quan wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016, at 05:27 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote: >> I have only one (rather big) issue with the proposal: it's not very >> friendly with experimental features/polyfills since there is no extra >> storage room for user-defined font features... I don't think we should >> ship any more anything at grammar-level that is not extensible because >> all properties/features are hardcoded. > > I think objects returned from DOM / CSSOM are not frozen in general, so > JS code should always be able to attach new attributes to those objects, > shouldn't it? In that case, fine by me. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2016 10:02:39 UTC