On Tue, Aug 2, 2016, at 05:27 PM, Daniel Glazman wrote: > I have only one (rather big) issue with the proposal: it's not very > friendly with experimental features/polyfills since there is no extra > storage room for user-defined font features... I don't think we should > ship any more anything at grammar-level that is not extensible because > all properties/features are hardcoded. I think objects returned from DOM / CSSOM are not frozen in general, so JS code should always be able to attach new attributes to those objects, shouldn't it? - XidornReceived on Tuesday, 2 August 2016 08:14:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:04 UTC