W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2015

Re: [css-grid] About the meaning of being "sized under min|max-content constraint"

From: Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:19:16 +0200
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <56006644.6060903@igalia.com>
On 19/09/15 00:02, fantasai wrote:
> On 09/18/2015 08:31 AM, Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd kindly ask the editors to clarify what being sized under
>> min|max-content constraint exactly means[1] for the track sizing
>> algorithm. In particular I'd like to know if we're talking about just
>> the width|height of the grid container or if we should
>> take a look also to our ancestors to check that (provided the grid has
>> relative or auto sizes).
>>
>> Should we want to extend it to our ancestors then the implementations
>> might start to suffer from severe performance issues
>> because we might need some extra layouts. For example if we want to
>> take into account the values of min|max-width|height
>> restrictions then we need to layout to know whether we're we satisfy
>> or not those conditions.
>
> It means when you're calculating the min-content/max-content
> contribution of the grid container, e.g. if the grid container
> happens to be inside a float (or is itself a float).

Oh, so I had taken it completely wrong. OK, just to be 100% sure, you 
mean that it does not apply for example to the following example:

<div style="display: grid; width: min-content;"></div>

I was assuming that the above was a grid container sized under 
min-content constraint, but from your answer this is just a grid with an 
indefinite width so the maximize tracks step will grow all the tracks to 
their growth limits. Is that correct?

BR
Received on Monday, 21 September 2015 20:19:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:57 UTC