- From: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 22:04:06 +0200
- To: "'fantasai'" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "'CSS WG'" <www-style@w3.org>
>From fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] > On 05/07/2015 06:35 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:56 PM, François REMY > > <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: > >> Tab Atkins said: > >>> Oh! You mean that you may or may not have enough items to fill a > >>> single line, and if you don't have enough, you'd like the grid to > >>> only generate as many columns as needed? > >> > >> Exactly ^_^ I thought it would be clear with my initial mail: > >> > >>> If I want the amount of repetitions to be constrained by a max-width > >>> constrain AND by the amount of repetitions required to display all > >>> items of the grid (to preserve the right horizontal centering), then > >>> I’m out of luck right now. > > > > We discussed this, and we agree it's a reasonable use-case. We could > > perhaps branch the repeat(auto,...) syntax to have two auto keyword, > > "auto-fill" and "auto-fit", where auto-fit automatically drops empty > > repetitions after placement but before layout. We'll need to give it > > some more thought and ask the WG what they think. > > To close off on this, the WG resolved to accept this solution, and it is now > edited into the spec: > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-1/#repeat-notation > > Please take a look and let us know if there's anything else that needs fixing > (or if we made any mistakes in the edits). > > ~fantasai Thanks for notying of the spec update. That looks good to me, overall, though I'm not sure I understand the "name-repeat" feature. Could you provide an example of how it's supposed to be used? Best regards, François
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2015 20:04:28 UTC