- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:32:20 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
- Cc: CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
On 05/07/2015 06:35 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > [btw, can you use the standard plain-text quoting character ">" > instead of "±"? The latter isn't recognized as blockquoting by most > tools.] > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:56 PM, François REMY > <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote: >> Tab Atkins said: >>> Oh! You mean that you may or may not have enough items to fill a single >>> line, and if you don't have enough, you'd like the grid to only generate as >>> many columns as needed? >> >> Exactly ^_^ I thought it would be clear with my initial mail: >> >>> If I want the amount of repetitions to be constrained by a max-width >>> constrain AND by the amount of repetitions required to display all items >>> of the grid (to preserve the right horizontal centering), then I’m out >>> of luck right now. > > We discussed this, and we agree it's a reasonable use-case. We could > perhaps branch the repeat(auto,...) syntax to have two auto keyword, > "auto-fill" and "auto-fit", where auto-fit automatically drops empty > repetitions after placement but before layout. We'll need to give it > some more thought and ask the WG what they think. To close off on this, the WG resolved to accept this solution, and it is now edited into the spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid-1/#repeat-notation Please take a look and let us know if there's anything else that needs fixing (or if we made any mistakes in the edits). ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 22:32:48 UTC