- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:15:37 -0700
- To: Peter Moulder <pjrm@mail.internode.on.net>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Peter Moulder <pjrm@mail.internode.on.net> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 06:21:04PM +0200, fantasai wrote: >> Is there a useful reason that we define the root element as out-of-flow? > > It might be for purposes of the immediately following phrase, "the flow of A" > (and related phrases such as "in the same flow"). Yeah, it seems likely that it was done solely to make that later sentence simpler. But I agree with fantasai that it's confusing in general, and we should instead call it in-flow but amend the following phrase to talk about roots as well. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 17:16:26 UTC