- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 00:01:00 +0900
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
> On 31 Oct 2015, at 20:21, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote: > > On 10/31/15, 6:33 PM, "Florian Rivoal" <florian@rivoal.net> wrote: > >> I got an action item from the WG to figure out if publishing a new WG of device adaptation would be only a date bump, or if it would include significant changes. >> >> I've been through the log, and it would indeed include fairly significant normative and editorial changes. >> >> I've added a change section to the spec (https://drafts.csswg.org/css-device-adapt/#changes), and I think we should publish a new WD. We should have a long time ago, sorry for not being proactive on this. >> >> Do we need a resolution in an upcoming conf call, or is the Sapporo discussion enough to request a new publication? > > Please add Matt Rakow as an editor as per the Sapporo resolution, Done. > and let’s give everyone until the next conf call to review the change section you’ve unearthed. Sounds good. As far as I remember all the substantive changes are backed by a WG resolution, but it's worth looking anyway, both at the change section and at the document in general, to see if we want to mark any issue in the document before publishing. - Florian
Received on Saturday, 31 October 2015 15:01:34 UTC