> On Oct 20, 2015, at 19:58, Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com> wrote: > > Interesting use case. Yes it seems like a valid usage, but allowing > multiple identifiers per @kerframes rule doesn't seem to make much > sense otherwise. > > Given the rule is that animation occurs when `animation-name` is > overridden, what about extending `animation-name` to accept an > optional extra component after each animation name, which doesn't have > meaning itself, just for triggering the overriding? > > - Xidorn I would argue that this is even more hacky. At least allowing aliases on @keyframes is a feature, even though it’s intended to help with a hack and could aid readability in other use cases too (e.g. reusing an animation for different purposes could now use different names). Allowing garbage in animation-name just to trigger changes is very, very conspicuously a hack :P ~LeaReceived on Wednesday, 21 October 2015 00:05:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:57 UTC