- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:21:03 -0700
- To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
- Cc: "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>, CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20151016192103.GA12461@pescadero.dbaron.org>
On Friday 2015-10-16 19:06 +0000, Alan Stearns wrote:
> On 10/15/15, 8:24 PM, "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com> wrote:
> >First off, I object to this a little bit on general principles: if I
> >want a shape to stick out of the element's margin box, that seems like
> >it should be allowed.
>
> It seems like this should work (and it did in the original design), but after some discussion we arrived at the margin box clipping for a few reasons. One is that we *have* to clip at the top of the margin box. A shape-outside on a float cannot affect preceding lines. So itβs a simpler story to clip all around the box than have to explain why weβre only clipping at the top.
Is it a feasible alternative to make the bounds of the float for
layout purposes be (on each side) the farther of the margin-box or
the box enclosing the shape-outside? In other words, if the
shape-outside goes above the top of the margin-box, the float moves
down?
(I'm not sure if it's a good idea or not; just suggesting it as an
option.)
-David
--
π L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ π
π’ Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ π
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Friday, 16 October 2015 19:21:42 UTC