2015-11-13 13:59 GMT-08:00 Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>: > > > > On Nov 13, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Back up a bit, the original request was "is it safe to ship > > 1-dimensional floats with logical directional values?" and while it'd > > be ideal to figure out the final syntax for 2-dimensional floats to > > answer to that question, I don't think it's absolutely required, as > > long as we can agree that: > > > > 1. If no other 2-dimensional-related properties are set (e.g., > > float-reference), and > > 2. If either 'start' or 'end' is specified > > > > we will handle it as 1-dimensional logical direction. > > > > I think this makes sense given the consistency with 1-dimensional > > properties such a text-align, and shipping 1-dimensional logical > > directional values before we finalize 2-dimensional syntax is > > beneficial. Tab's response reads to me that Tab and fantasai are fine > > with this. > > The problem is that it does depend on the final syntax somewhat. For the > way I'd like it, start and end would be the values to use for one > dimensional floats. But if 'start' ends up being short for 'start start' > instead of 'start none', that that wouldn't work too well. It would change > the meaning of 'float: start'. If we could agree that 'start' is short for > 'start' in the inline direction and 'none' in the block direction, then I > think 'start' and 'end' are the best choice. > IIUC, it would change "only if float-reference is set to non-initial value," so I still believe we can resolve 1-dimensional syntax independently. /kojiReceived on Friday, 13 November 2015 22:04:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:58 UTC